Madison Sieg vs Sydney Jara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Sep at 02:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sieg vs S. Jara

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Sieg 1 - 0 Jara
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madison Sieg winning 2 and Sydney Jara winning 0. The last match between Madison Sieg and Sydney Jara was at the W35 Punta Cana, 03-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Madison Sieg getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sieg | 1 |
Jara | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Punta Cana(09-03-25)
M. Sieg vs S. Jara H2H Profile
M. Sieg vs S. Jara Match Preview
- Jara holds a slight edge in second serve performance with a 39.77% success rate compared to Sieg’s 39.1%.
- On return games, Sieg slightly outperforms Jara on second serve returns, achieving 49.71% versus Jara's 49.32%.
- When examining first serve returns, Jara has a minor advantage at 35.44% over Sieg’s 35.38%.
- Under pressure, Jara excels in saving breakpoints, successfully saving 50% compared to Sieg’s 41.76%.
- Jara's impressive match win percentage stands at 66.67% over the past year, overshadowing Sieg’s 38.78%.
- Jara’s most successful surface is Clay, with an 80% win rate, whereas Sieg is best on Indoor hard courts at 55%.
- While Sieg competes mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments, Jara frequents Futures/Satellites tournaments, and both have varying success at these levels.
- Jara’s average opponent ranking is higher at 249.17, showing more experience against better-ranked players, compared to Sieg’s 393.24.
- In deciding sets, Jara demonstrates strong performance, securing 63% of them, whereas Sieg wins 44%.
- Jara is more efficient at converting breakpoints, with a rate of 46.34%, compared to Sieg’s 42.54% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both players' current form and historical performance indicates that Jara has an edge in several critical areas. The ability to save breakpoints efficiently and convert them into scoring opportunities showcases Jara's capability under pressure.
Sieg has shown skill in return games, particularly against second serves, but Jara's overall higher win rate in matches and deciding sets points to greater match experience and resilience.
Jara's success on Clay and varied tournament experience also contribute positively to their profile, making them more prepared for high-level competition. As a result, Jara is favored to outperform Sieg in the upcoming match based on these facts.
Madison Sieg vs Sydney Jara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Sieg vs S. Jara H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
2:17:31 | Avg. Match Time | 2:17:31 |
64% (51/80) | 1st Serve % | 65% (36/55) |
55% (28/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (17/36) |
48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
56% (31/55) | Return Pts Won % | 48% (38/80) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Sieg Recent Matches Played
S. Jara Recent Matches Played

M. Sieg vs S. Jara Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53.00% (115/102) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.54% (16/10) |
51.02% (250/240) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.02% (36/25) |
50.16% (2208/2194) | Games Win/Loss | 55.77% (314/249) |
52.50% (63/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.16% (12/7) |
53.25% (41/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
55.00% (11/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
243 | Aces Total | 2 |
0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
752 | Total Double Faults | 29 |
1:42:40 | Average Match Time | 1:1:51 |
445.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 248.5 |
63% (8367/13348) | 1st Serve % | 74% (691/933) |
59% (4940/8367) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (374/691) |
45% (2232/4981) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (112/242) |
49% (850/1748) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (59/120) |
46% (6302/13643) | Return Points Win % | 47% (425/908) |
0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.82% (93/90) | Challenger W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
68.75% (22/10) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
53% (112/212) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (16/26) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
56% (19/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
63% (36/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) |
89% (109/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (13/12) |
11% (109/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (13/1) |
17% (108/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (13/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
